New Deals for Cards' Front Office
posted November 10
“Mo and his staff have helped to consistently guide our organization over the past 12 seasons, and after some recent close finishes, we were excited to see the team win the N.L. Central this season and advance to the League Championship Series. I’m pleased to announce today that Mo has agreed to continue to the lead our baseball operations into the next decade.”
And with those words, St. Louis Cardinals’ Chairman Bill De Witt, Jr. announced the extensions of the contracts of the team’s Front Office: President of Baseball Operations John Mozeliak, Vice President & General Manager Michael Girsch and Field Manager Mike Shildt.
Mozeliak has been with the team since 1995. He was promoted to Senior Vice President-General Manager in October 2007. In June 2017 he assumed the newly-crafted title of President of Baseball Operations. During Mozeliak’s twelve-year tenure St. Louis has reached the post season seven times with two World Series appearances and one World Series Championship.
Girsch was named V.P. & General Manager in June of 2017. He has been a member of the Cardinals organization since 2006
Shildt was named interim Manager on July 15,2018 after the firing of Mike Matheny. Later that summer Shildt was named the full time manager and was given a two year extension. Since taking over in mid-July 2018, Shildt’s teams are 132-99 (a winning percentage of .571). He was named a National League Manager of the Year finalist after leading the Red Birds to the National League Central Division Championship.
Given this announcement and the remarks, this bureau concludes that the Team’s Ownership is satisfied with its Front Office.
After the announcement the floor was open for questions. During the Q&A, Mozeliak was asked if there would be any roster changes during the winter. This bureau has noticed over the past years whenever answering a direct or uncomfortable question, the President of Baseball Operations begins filibustering in a professorial and at times condescending tone. To this question, Mo did not disappoint.
“Clearly when you hear a question like that, the first reaction you have is, well, we’re not stale “But I can understand the perception. We’ve always looked at how we think about our decision tree, how we think about our communication tree, and that’s one of the things that Bill, Girsch, and myself is we’re always struggling — to make sure someone’s voice doesn’t get old, someone’s voice doesn’t become noise.”
“We certainly don’t want to be a broken record. We certainly don’t want to be an organization that doesn’t feel like we’re trying to innovate or be fresh. We recognize all of that. As you even think about our club and how it was built this year, there is not a lot of room for change.
We’ll try to interpret. After that long-winded soliloquy, much like the ownership group is satisfied with the Front Office, the Front Office seems satisfied with the current roster.
That leads to the obvious question: should they be?
2019 did matter for the local nine. To their credit, the team delivered: capturing the NL Central title. We suggested in this space during the summer that the Cardinals did not necessarily have to be good, but just good enough. In the end the 2019 Cardinals were good enough.
But should the Front Office be satisfied with just being good enough or should they strive to be better than just good enough?
Due to some bad Front Office calculations, much dead money remains on the Cardinal payroll. For the foreseeable future, the team will be issuing hefty paychecks to Brett Cecil & Mike Leake while also cutting sizable checks to likely part time players Dexter Fowler and Matt Carpenter.
If payroll size is factor for choosing to hold still, then it will be a tough sell to the self-proclaimed Best Fans in Baseball. That is especially true watching those overpriced condos and that high-rise luxury hotel being constructed beyond Busch Stadium’s left field wall.
Then comes this question: if the Front Office is satisfied with the roster, then are they also satisfied with the first class beatdown issued by the Washington Nationals? Right now, the Cardinal roster does not match up with the Nationals’ roster (again look at the combined box scores). Going further, raise your hand if you really believe the St. Louis roster is better than say, the Los Angeles Dodgers.
Good enough was good enough to win the 2019 National League Central Division Championship.
Good enough was far from good enough to win the 2019 National League pennant.
Sam Miller of ESPN.com writes: “I wouldn't say that this turnaround convinced us all that the Cardinals are a great team -- they were the worst postseason team to make the division series round -- or that they're poised to repeat next year. But the Cardinals had been pretty good the previous three years and hadn't made the playoffs.”
It’s the first week of November and there are still lots of unanswered questions.
The team will likely be in a holding pattern until outfielder Marcell Ozuna decided to accept or not accept the team’s qualifying offer. The deadline is November 14 for Ozuna and his new agent to craft a deal or if #23 will venture into the streams of free agency.
Once that is decided then the unanswered questions (or more) remain. Who will be the other two starting pitchers that will compliment Jack Flaherty, Dakota Hudson and Miles Mikolas? There are loads of candidates for just a few outfield spots: who are the last men standing? Exactly who does Shildt hand the baseball to in the 9th inning? How much dead money will the Front Office allow to sit on the bench? Given the results from the NLDS, is the Front Office really satisfied with the offense of this team?
Yeah, there are still lots of unanswered questions. Again, are they really satisfied?
The off-season has just started. It will be three months until the welcome mat is rolled out in Jupiter, Florida.
To Mr. Mozeliak, Mr. Girsch and Mr. Shildt, congratulations.
Now, are you really satisfied with the hand you are holding?
Diaz, Kurt Warner & Talent Evaluation: Tunnel Vision, Not Knowing
What You Don't Know & Missing Greatness
In June of 1981 I met a
young lady (Susan) who, in
September of 1982, became my wife.
In 1983 we attended a
David Bowie concert at what
was then known as the Rosemont Horizon (in suburban Chicago). By that
Bowie had become a mainstream pop star whose songs were heard all over
It was my first Bowie
show, and the entire
experience catalyzed an acute awareness of David Bowie and his music.
the party, eh?)
In 2004 Bowie performed
at St. Louis' Fox Theatre,
we were there, and those in attendance were mesmerized by what we
were in the presence of a star.
By that time, I had
gained knowledge of most of his
career--in large part thanks to wife Susan, who was far 'ahead of the
Forty years ago (March 3,
1976, to be precise),
Susan attended her first David Bowie concert, at Chicago's
She was eighteen years old and returned home from college to see the show--accompanied by her younger brother.
Bowie's perfomance confirmed what she first suspected years previously after seeing the man on a Saturday night Don Kirshner-style music video TV show: namely, David Bowie was an avant-garde performer with world-class talent, talent impossible to ignore if you knew what to look for.
Literally ten days prior
to Bowie's International
Amphitheater show, that same Bowie tour paused in Evansville IN on
1976, for a Sunday night performance at Roberts Stadium (the home of
Evansville Purple Aces basketball team).
I was seventeen at the
time, still a senior at a
small town high school located a half-hour or so from Roberts Stadium...but
I believed I had better things to do than watch some Brit named David
perform a couple dozen of his songs.
As I look back to
February of 1976, I had plenty of
awareness of the upcoming bicentennial celebration; plenty of awareness
school advanced chemistry, physics, trigonometry and analytic geometry;
of enjoyment of high school golf; a fun job at an area supermarket
laugh: $2.10/hr and time-and-a-half on Sundays); as well as fun and
with friends and a high school sweetheart.
This was my world, and it
was all good.
But my good
world, in February
of 1976, would have been my better world if I
possessed a little more awareness of the earth around me and had opened
to the talents of David Bowie, who, to me at the time, was the guy who
throwaway Top 40 pop song 'Golden Years'.
Therefore, in 1976, I had
no interest in attending
the Bowie show in Evansville, Indiana.
After all, it was a
Sunday night (school the next
day!) and I had never attended anything other than basketball games and
Shrine Circus in Roberts Stadium, a venue that I believed to be
during rock concerts, with pot-smokers and troublemakers that roamed
a world that I did not understand.
In other words, my
perspective was foolishly
limited and suffered from myriad distractions, and my tunnel vision
that world was incomplete.
The result of tunnel
vision? I didn't know
what I didn't know.
Tunnel vision in professional sports?
On a micro scale, Cardinals' rookie shortstop Aledmys Diaz comes to mind as a player whose skills were viewed by major league talent evaluators with tunnel vision: they didn't know what they didn't know.
Prior to the 1999 season, the Rams signed free-agent QB Trent Green to a four-year multimillion dollar contract, and viewed Warner, at best, as a back-up--because he (Warner) was made available to the Cleveland Browns in the NFL's 1999 Expansion Draft!
The Browns did select a quarterback in their expansion draft: Tampa Bay QB Scott Milanovich, who was released before training camp commenced. Browns' management were convinced that #1-overall draft choice Tim Couch would be their QB for a decade.
Nearly two decades later, the Cleveland Browns are still looking for a quarterback while Super Bowl champion Kurt Warner hopes for his induction to the professional football Hall of Fame, and Aledmys Diaz is hoping for an invitation to Miami for the 2016 MLB All Star Game.
The Cards' Offseason...Begins Now
the regular season in this little corner of cyberspace this bureau
wondered if the 2019 St. Louis Cardinals were good enough
It turns out they were good enough to win the 2019 National League Central Division Championship.
It also turns out they were good enough to win the first round in the 2019 National League Divisional Championship.
But that is where the story ends.
So, welcome to the off-season.
The Red Birds’ excellent October adventure ended by hitting a brick wall. The Washington Nationals completed a four-game sweep in the NLCS. The sweep sent the Nats into the World Series for the first time ever. It also sent the local nine back to the Gateway City shaking their heads, asking a bunch of questions: wondering if anyone got the license number of the truck that just hit them.
This was not a sweep: this was a beat down. Washington was not just the better team during this series, but they outclassed the Red Birds in every facet. The Cardinals never led at any time in the series. In the two games in DC, the Nationals outscored the Red Birds 15-5. The knockout punch occurred in shock & awe fashion as Washington scored seven runs in the first inning of the deciding Game Four.
Throughout the four game sweep, the National pitching staff was simply superb and totally dominant. The Washington hurlers combined team earned run average of 1.25 in the four games. Of the 108 St. Louis outs in the series, forty-eight (aka: a dozen per game) of them were strikeouts (aka: 44.4%).
On the other side the Cardinals’ bats were anemic. In the two games played at Busch III, the Red Birds scored only one run. St. Louis hitters batted .130 and scored only six runs in the series while collecting only sixteen hits. For those without a calculator at home, that average comes to four hits per game.
(Just wondering: has anyone asked the Red Birds’ recently-dubbed hitting guru Jeff Albert his thoughts on what just occurred?)
Yeah, this was indeed a beat down. After the Nats scored seven runs in the first inning of Game 4, inquiring minds wonder how many folks in this Red State flipped the channel to the Democratic Presidential debate. Things got so bad that even the apologists at the Cardinals’ primary funding partner known at Fox Sports Midwest didn’t even try to spin the narrative to highlight the positives for those still tuning in.
In 1969, an expansion franchise then known as the Montreal Expos opened play in the then-National League Eastern Division. Through the years the Expos had good players (some even Hall of Famers) on its roster. Yet a wide variety of outside events always seemed to stall the team’s progress. From a poorly designed stadium converted from the 1976 Olympics, to on-going ownership issues, to a Rick Monday playoff home run in 1981, to the abrupt 1994 players strike that canceled a season when Montreal owned the best record in Baseball, to the threat of franchise extinction through contraction, the Expos seemed jinxed.
In 2005 the franchise relocated from Canada to the District of Columbia. That jinxed feeling continued in DC. Remember 2012 NLDS Game Five where they blew a 6-0 lead only to lose and the 18 inning loss in Game Two of the 2014 NLDS? The franchise never won a playoff series.
Now, fifty years later the franchise formerly known as the Montreal Expos are headed to the World Series for the first time in their history.
Meanwhile here in self-proclaimed Baseball Heaven, it is the start of the off-season.
Michael Bauman of The Ringer.com offers his thoughts: “Despite a three-year playoff absence, and despite coming into the season as third-favorites in the NL Central, the Cardinals were able to win baseball’s messiest division through quiet competence. They outlasted the grotesquely dysfunctional Cubs and the injury-plagued Brewers, and gutted out a hard-fought NLDS against the Braves, in which every victory was memorable. The late comebacks in games 1 and 4, to say nothing of the 10-run first inning in Game 5, will go down as the kind of rosy memories fans sit through an entire season hoping to experience. That the Cardinals were so thoroughly shellacked in the NLCS is less than ideal—certainly compared to a trip to the World Series—but it’s a small part of a generally positive year-long narrative.”
2019 should be considered a success for the Cardinals. One could even conclude that 2019 did indeed matter. Not many of the inside or outside the 314 last March predicted the Red Birds as one of the last teams standing in October. But after a sold post-All Star Game surge assisted in very large part to the implosion and underperforming of that wannabe dynasty on the north side of Chicago, the Cardinals captured the Division title. That should be applauded. Winning a division should be considered something special and not taken for granted.
“You can’t argue that we also won the division and got to the NLCS — it’s not the ultimate goal, but we got part of the way there,” St. Louis first baseman Paul Goldschmidt said after Game Four. “Next year is going to be a new year. There are going to be new players. We’ve got to earn every win. Take this experience for what it is. Try to improve. See what happens.”
And that “improvement process” starts right now with plenty of questions:
Will the Cardinals offer outfielder Marcell Ozuna a free agent qualifying offer and if so, does the team hope he will or will not accept the offer?
Have we seen the last of Adam Wainwright wearing #50 with the birds on the bat?
Where will Michael Wacha be playing in 2020?
Is Carlos Martinez a starter or is he a reliever?
What exactly will Matt Carpenter’s role be in 2020?
Will there be enough playing time for Harrison Bader, Tyler O’Neill, Lane Thomas, famed videographer Randy Arozarena and newest can’t miss prospect Dylan Carlson?
How vigorously will the front office explore free agent starter and/or relief pitchers?
If 2020 will be Yadier Molina’s final Major League season as he said when he signed his last contract, what happens next?
Exactly who does Mike Shildt hand the ball to in the 9th inning?
Those questions and likely others will need to be answered before the team reconvenes in Jupiter, Florida in February. The local nine still hasn’t appeared in a World Series that ends in the number 9.
Welcome to the off-season.
Baseball is Back!
posted April 2
It is good to have Baseball back.
Here in self-proclaimed Baseball Heaven expectations are high for their heroes to return to post-season play. The 2019 St. Louis Cardinals are a better baseball team than the St. Louis Cardinal team that walked off at Wrigley Field on Sunday afternoon September 30, 2018. The mere acquisition of first baseman Paul Goldschmidt has made 2019 St. Louis a better baseball team.
But what exactly does that mean? Those in the know believe that the Red Birds have closed the gap between them and the top two teams in the National League Central Division. St. Louis is considered by many as a potential playoff team in October. Still, the scoreboard will have the final say.
The Cardinals would get an early test during the first weekend of the season in Milwaukee in a four-game opening-weekend series against the NLCD defending champion Brewers.
Four games later, the results are in. The Red Birds earned a low score on that first test.
Now, the bureau concedes this weekend is a very small sample size and that a Major League Baseball season is very, very long. But in the end, four games against a strong divisional rival in their backyard is an important series if it were played in April or July or September. St. Louis’ mission was to get at least a split of the four-game series. If that occurred, four games in Milwaukee would be wiped off the schedule with no effect on the standings.
But that didn’t happen.
Instead, the Brewers sent a message to the Cardinals and Central Division that they are still here and have no plans on leaving. Milwaukee won three out of four in the opening series against St. Louis. The Red Birds head to Pittsburgh two games behind the Brewers in the standings.
Again we repeat: this is a very small sample size and that a Major League Baseball season is very, very long.
During the first series there was there good news and there was bad news for the local nine.
The good news is that the Cardinals scored nineteen runs in their first four games in Milwaukee. The bad news is Red Bird pitching allowed nineteen runs against the Brewers.
The good news is that St. Louis hit eight home runs in the four game series. The bad news is that Milwaukee hit nine long flies in those four games.
The good news is that the newly-acquired Goldschmidt blasted four home runs in the series: three in one game. The bad news is defending NL Most Valuable Player Christian Yelich also hit four home runs in the series: but he hit one in each of the four games.
The good news is that the Cardinal defense only committed one error in the series. The bad news is that Red Bird batters struck out 43 times in 36 innings against Milwaukee pitching.
The concerning issue though is how the finale ended. The Red Birds held a three-run lead with nine outs to go. By getting those final nine outs, St. Louis would have achieved their objective: splitting the series and wiping four games at Miller Park off the schedule with no affect in the standings.
But that didn’t happen because the Cardinal bullpen did not complete the task in late innings. Despite all those glowing accolades bestowed by the apologists on Fox Sports Midwest regarding the effectiveness of free agent reliever Andrew Miller and the velocity of Jordan Hicks’ pitches, the St. Louis bullpen blew the save in the critical fourth game. Hicks did not get anyone out in the ninth inning as the Brewers captured the finale in walk off fashion.
Again we repeat: this is a very small sample size and that a Major League Baseball season is very, very long. But this series and particularly game four, highlights a concern suggested during those cold winter nights: just who will Mike Shildt give the ball to in the ninth inning?
In today’s game, teams need that shutdown closer or that shutdown bullpen if they have dreams of playing in October. To illustrate and keeping it close to home, let’s review the numbers:
In 2018, the Cardinal bullpen blew 21 saves. The Red Birds finished three games out of the final National League Wild Cards spot.
In 2017, the St. Louis bullpen blew 17 saves. In the end, the team finished four games out of the final Wild Card spot.
In 2016, the Red Bird bullpen blew 17 saves. That Cardinal team finished just one game out of the final National League Wild Card spot.
In 2018, Bud Norris earned 28 saves for St. Louis. In 2017 Seung-hwan Oh earned 20 saves and Trevor Rosenthal captured 11 saves. In 2016, Oh compiled 19 saves and Rosenthal 14 saves.
We now fast forward to the start of the 2019 regular season: Norris, Oh and Rosenthal are not on the St. Louis roster.
So the question remains: just who will Mike Shildt give the ball to in the ninth inning? At this writing that answer is: to be determined.
The Red Birds will play two games in Pittsburgh before returning to the 314 for the home opener against the San Diego Padres. It’s hard to believe Thursday afternoon will be the fourteenth opening day at Busch III.
(SIDE NOTE: With rain in the forecast for Opening Day, inquiring minds wonder what is the over/under for the number of innings the majority of the self-proclaimed Best Fans in Baseball will hang around during the home opener once the Clydesdales and the convertibles leave the field.)
Again we repeat: this is a very small sample size and that a Major League Baseball season is very, very long.
But regardless of the month, the four games in Milwaukee were a missed opportunity.
It’s April and welcome to the return of Baseball, Cardinal Nation.
And it’s good to have it back.
St. Louis Sports Online
Batting Orders on the Eights:
1978, 1998 and 2008. 2018?
posted July 24
Let’s pick an arbitrary year in major league baseball—1978.
In 1978, Vern Rapp, Jack Krol and Ken Boyer served as manager of the Cardinals. The batting orders for all 162 Cardinals games that season ‘featured’ a pitcher in the ninth spot in the lineup.
Rapp, Krol and Boyer were following baseball’s 1978 lineup norms: a given team’s pitcher nearly always batted ninth in his team’s lineup.
One year later (1979), Tony La Russa began his baseball managerial career when he was hired to manage the Chicago White Sox.
Fast forward about twenty years to 1998.
During the 1998 season’s All Star break, then-Cardinals manager Tony La Russa, with nearly two decades of major league managerial experience already under his belt, dispensed with the pitcher-must-bat-ninth ‘wisdom’.
And for the balance of that ’98 season, La Russa broke with tradition and wrote lineup cards in which his starting pitcher was listed in the #8 spot in his lineup.
Recall two salient facts about La Russa’s 1998 Cardinals squad:
(1) the team was average (83-79 final W-L record; third place in the NL Central)
(2) in 1998, Mark McGwire (after hitting 58 homers while playing for Oakland and St. Louis in 1997) was engaged in a historic season-long chase to eclipse Roger Maris’ single-season record of 61 home runs
Perhaps La Russa felt an obligation to McGwire, who traditionalists viewed as a prototypical clean-up hitter…to get Big Mac as many at-bats as possible, to enhance his chances to break the record.
The move also served as an attention-grabber, and diverted fans (and media) from the rather obvious fact that the Cardinals 1998 team, as a whole, was not a strong contender for post-season play.
Whenever asked, La Russa pointed out that with a ‘hitterish’ position player batting ninth (instead of a weak-hitting hurler), McGwire, in every inning except the first, essentially could be thought of as a clean-up hitter—thus at least partially satisfying baseball’s old-school thinkers.
So the debate began in 1998—where should the pitcher bat in the lineup?
Ten years later...in 2008, La Russa revisited the issue, when future Hall-of-Famer Albert Pujols hit third in the Cardinals order. In this case, La Russa aimed to enhance the run production of his line-up by enabling ‘The Machine (Pujols)' to see more runners on base.
Fast forward ten more years--to 2018.
The debate concerning La Russa’s ‘innovation’ continues, with Cubs’ manager Joe Maddon among many of today’s MLB managers who have dabbled with ‘hitting the pitcher eighth’.
With every MLB team accessing supercomputers on a daily basis and hiring ‘quants’ to program those computers to their specifications , you can be certain that literally millions of line-up combinations have been simulated...and everybody from the geekiest team employee to the owner has an opinion based on those ‘data’ that aims to answer the question—should a pitcher always bat ninth in the lineup?
Well, if there was ever a line-up that might see benefits from a position player with some ‘pop in his bat’ hitting ninth...not three positions in front of #3 hitters such as Mark McGwire and Albert Pujols, but directly in front of baseball’s hottest hitter (Matt Carpenter), had the new Cardinals skipper given any thought to what, twenty years ago, was a St. Louis innovation?
In the Great America Ball Park visiting dugout, I asked Cardinals interim manager Mike Shildt that very question prior to today’s game (July 24) vs. the Reds, one day after his squad lost to the Reds...2-1 in walk-off fashion.
You can listen to Shildt’s response here (along with Talking Heads and Pretenders music in the background...1978?!) or go old school yourself and scroll down for the written word.
Either way, check those box scores, folks.
Q: There's a twenty year history in St. Louis, going back to '98, of the pitcher hitting eighth in the batting order. Your best hitter is...leadoff. Does that cause you to think about batting order a little bit?
Mike Shildt: It is food for thought. It's not anything traditional I've done. I'm still trying to get my head around, quite honestly, what that looks like, and the reasoning behind it. I know there's different reasons for and against, clearly...to point out to make a commitment to what that looks like.
To your point about Carp leading off, as productive as he's been, to get somebody in front of him...it kind of backs up a couple of days ago what you're thinking about.
You know we hit for Miles [Mikolas] the other day, in the fifth inning, or the top of the sixth inning, rather, in Chicago, you know when he still had some pitches on the table.
And I didn't communicate as well as I'd like to after that game. It is also a decision based on, if we get Jed [Gyorko] on at that point, now we get Carp up, and that's a chance to break the game open. So there is some methodology to what that looks like.
Thanks for reading.
Mike Huss' Take Five
posted April 13
Random thoughts & observations as many of the self-proclaimed Baseball Fans in Baseball suffer from early April panic attacks
Retirement congrats#1: University of Michigan Head Men’s Hockey Coach Red Berenson announced his retirement after 33 seasons behind the Wolverine bench. The 77-year old Berenson led Michigan to eleven Frozen Four appearances. The Gateway City remembers the Red Baron quite fondly as he was the Blues first Superstar, former Captain and Head Coach. Well done, Coach.
Retirement contrats#2: Former St. Louis Rams middle linebacker James Laurinatis announced his retirement from that rich & arrogant cartel better known as the National Football League. The thirty-year old Laurinatis played eight seasons: seven in St. Louis. #55 was a class act: a hard working football player on some awful teams. Still, he did not pout about his fate and put his team first. Laurinatis deserved better in his NFL career but this bureau bids him the best in retirement.
Wanna feel old? Happy 76th birthday, Pete Rose (4/14/17)
Wasn’t Ken Hitchcock scheduled to retire from coaching after this season?
AND FINALLY FROM THE “LEGAL DOCKET” BUREAU: In a 4/12/17 story in our town’s only newspaper, football writer Jim Thomas writes: “he city, the county and the Regional Convention and Sports Complex Authority are suing the National Football League over the relocation of the Rams 15 months ago. "The Rams, the NFL, through its member teams, and the owners have violated the obligations and standards governing team relocations" because the Rams failed to meet league relocation rules, the suit claims. As such, the league has breached its contractual duties owed the plaintiffs, the suit says.” And in a related story, Los Angeles Rams’ owner Stan Kroenke yawns.
Comments? Contact Mike at: firstname.lastname@example.org
Last Saturday (March 1), Harry Caray would have been 100 years old.
No kidding: It might be—it could be—it is: a century
For those of us baby boomers that grew up in the Gateway City, state of Missouri, the Ozark region or throughout the Midwest, Harry Caray was the soundtrack of summer. For a quarter century, Caray was the voice of the St. Louis Cardinals. His style was unique and no holds bar. His voice boomed describing the exploits of Stan Musial, Red Schoendienst, Lou Brock, Bob Gibson and others. For twenty-five years, Harry Caray was the sound of St. Louis baseball.
In the world where one can be immediately identified by their first name (Elvis, Ozzie, Madonna, etc), if back in the day you said that “Harry” was on the radio, you knew exactly who was on the air. For many of us growing up in the 1960s and earlier, Caray’s familiar, bold and dramatic musings heard through a transistor radio muffled under a pillow (as we were hiding it from our parents after being sent to bed) created the perfect ending to a summer’s evening.
Born Harry Christopher Carabina from Italian and Romanian parents, he grew up on La Salle Street on the near south side of St. Louis on 3/1/1914. Caray’s father died when he was an infant and his mother died when he was around eight years old. In essence he grew up as an orphan.
In his youth Caray played semipro baseball before auditioning for a radio job at age nineteen. It was then when young Harry found his calling. He would cut his teeth in the radio business in markets such as Joliet, Illinois and Kalamazoo, Michigan before returning to his home town. He joined the Cardinals radio broadcast team in 1945. It was here in St. Louis and particularly behind a hot KMOX radio microphone where the legend of Harry Caray evolved.
It was Caray’s voice that narrated the stories of the successful seasons of the mid/late 1940s, the challenging 1950s and the memorable 1960s for the Cardinals. But it was during the down years of the 1950s when Caray’s career rose to prominence. In February 1953, August A. Busch, Jr. convinced his Anheuser-Busch Board of Directors to purchase the Cardinals from Fred Saigh. The Big Eagle and Harry Caray were both cut from the same cloth. Both wanted to be the center of attention. Both appreciated pretty girls. Both were Type-A. Both were highly competitive.
But most importantly, both could sell beer. That alliance would make Harry larger than life. Over the KMOX airwaves he was an unabashed homer. But above all, he could sell beer. Busch once referred to Caray as his best beer salesman. The bond was then formed.
Behind Busch’s influence, the powerful KMOX signal and Caray’s bombastic style the Cardinal radio network became the largest in the Major Leagues. Prior to 1957, St. Louis was the westernmost franchise. Cardinal fans were emerging west of the Mississippi. Caray was the evangelist. Casual and non-baseball fans listened to the games only to hear what Harry had to say. During it all, he promoted and pushed Budweiser. The match seemed made in heaven.
The Cardinals went to the World Series three times during the 1960s: winning it all twice. After advancing to the series in 1967 and 1968, St. Louis was expected to make it a three-peat. It didn’t happen. In 1969 St. Louis finished a disappointing third in the newly created NL East. But days after the final out, a bombshell was dropped in the Gateway City. Harry Caray and the Cardinals parted ways. The larger than life broadcaster was out as Cardinal broadcaster.
There have been many of urban legends as to what led to the split. We’ll never know for sure. But we did observe in a pre-cable, pre-internet era, that the divorce was far from amicable.
Leaving St. Louis, Caray took his talents to Oakland where he spent one season working for the colorful Charles O Finley’s A’s. One year later, Caray was signed as an announcer by legendary owner and promoter Bill Veeck of the Chicago White Sox. It would not take long for Harry to discover that Chicago was indeed his kind of town.
During Caray’s tenure on the south side, the White Sox were not very good. In his first season the Sox went 56-106. The high water mark was 1977 when they won 90 games. During Caray’s time on the South Side, the Sox had a losing record in eight seasons.
But despite the ineptness on the field, fans listened to the White Sox games because of Harry Caray. Partnered with the colorful and unpredictable Jimmy Piersall, the broadcasts were more entertaining than the games. Caray introduced Comiskey Park fans to the familiar chant from the musical group Steam as pitchers were removed from the game or when the Sox were going to win: “na-na-na-na---na-na-na-na-----hey, hey, hey---Good Bye”.
Caray and Piersall would broadcast games from the bleachers. On July 12, 1979 Harry spoke over the Comiskey Park PA pleading for calm on “Disco Demolition Night” where the Sox had to forfeit the second game of a doubleheader. Fans rushed the field causing extensive damage.
Yep, the White Sox were not very good then—but it was sure fun to listen to the games.
In 1982, Caray moved to the north side of Chicago: signing a contract to broadcast games for the Cubs. It was there through the magic and power of the WGN-TV Superstation signal where Harry Caray would be introduced to a new generation of baseball fans. The Cubs turned Harry loose over the airwaves and it proved to be reality television at its finest. The Cubs were not very good. But just like when with the White Sox, baseball fans tuned in to hear Caray offer his insight and opinions: from trying to pronounce player’s names backwards to welcoming who at the ball park that day to saluting the smallest towns throughout the fruited plain.
During his stay with the Cubs, Caray introduced his trademark: the seventh inning stretch singing of “Take Me Out to the Ball Game”. Regardless of the score or the loyalty, Wrigley Field fans sang along with Harry: as Caray, then in his 70s, used his microphone as a baton.
My last conversation with Harry was in 1996. It was during a Saturday afternoon game at Busch Stadium II between the Cardinals and Cubs. Prior to the game, I was in the press lounge. Sitting very quietly in the corner was Harry Caray watching the Fox Network pre-game show. On the screen was his grandson Chip. As I passed his table, Harry smiled and said to me, “isn’t he great?” I politely smiled, agreed continued some small talk. During it all Harry just kept smiling.
So here is this larger than life personality I grew up listening to via a transistor radio under my pillow savoring the moment as a proud grandfather. I started smiling also.
In 1989, Harry would be inducted into the Broadcaster’s wing of the Baseball Hall of Fame and a year later, into the National Radio Hall of Fame. He suffered a stroke in 1987. But Caray would not leave the broadcast booth. Then in February 1998, Caray fell at a restaurant and suffered a head injury. He died February 18, 1998 of cardiac arrest with resulting brain damage.
1998 was the season of the great Home Chase that rescued baseball from the 1994 Work Stoppage. The Cardinals’ Mark Mc Guire and the Cubs’ Sammy Sosa would blast long flies in pursuit of Roger Maris’s single season home run record. It would have been fun and perhaps fitting had Harry hung around one more year to describe those events as only he could.
Today, television (particularly cable television) is the primary outlet for baseball. The legendary baseball voices from past years have been replaced by some combination of blow-dried polished announcers and former ball players: each parroting team written talking points and are nothing more than an extension of the team’s marketing department. You know: always remember that good seats are available, always look for the positives and never criticize the Home Team.
I wonder if Harry Caray would have been hired as a broadcaster in today’s environment. My thinking is probably not. And that’s too bad. Games were sure more fun during Harry’s day.
Last Saturday (March 1), Harry Caray would have been 100 years old.
On the same date the
Beatles made their appearance on the Ed Sullivan Show a half century
earlier, this Sunday will also mark the twenty-fifth anniversary
of the death of long-time St. Louis Blues broadcaster Dan Kelly. He
once was called the "purest, most knowledgeable, most accurate" voice
in hockey. Kelly was 52 years old when he died at his Chesterfield home
after a five-month struggle with cancer.
...from the stlsports.com archives:
Check it out!
originally posted June 17, 1995
In a nutshell, the guy has as much talent as any young broadcaster, since, say, a youthful Bob Costas. Most St. Louis Sports Online readers surely recall that Costas, fresh out of Syracuse University, took St. Louis, and then the country, by storm.
thinking about Joe Buck and the kinds of questions I would ask, two
things came to mind. First, I hoped to bring StLSO readers some new and
timely information about the Cards young broadcaster. On this point I
feel reasonably confident.
In that regard I failed, as Joe Buck played all Shannon-related questions straight down the middle, earnestly saying that “Mike has been extremely helpful to me just starting out in this business.”
Prior to a recent Cards-Braves game, Buck and I sat down in the dining room behind the Fulton County Stadium press box. He is 26 years old...and looks young enough (and fit enough) to be part of a double play combo with Cards shortstop Tripp Cromer. Indeed, Buck said that the Cards had thoughts of drafting him right out of high school. I should have reminded him that the Cardinals drafted Paul Coleman right out of high school, too.
surprise no one that Joe Buck, who makes his living as a play-by-play
sportscaster, is a verbal individual. But I was surprised to find Buck
to be extremely intelligent, as well. Throughout the interview he
listened very intently to the questions, and at times, gave quite
specific and carefully worded answers that sort of demanded that the
original question be rephrased. When a tough question was posed, he
wouldn’t give an inch. In other words, the guy is good...and, at least
in this interview, didn’t really let down his guard too much. In
retrospect, perhaps I could have done a better job interviewing him.
we started, Buck was kind enough to remind me to turn on the recorder...
always good radio to be found the day after the Philly Eagles lose.
That's because 97.5 The Fanatic employs long-time sports-talk radio pro
Tony Bruno, who, with wit and wisdom and alacrity, persuades most (but
not all) of his ever-insufferable listeners not to jump from the top of
the nearest tall building. The wonder of the internet brings Bruno and
his Philly-based station to anyone looking for an entertaining
WDBX Sunday Sports Review
...from the stlsports.com archives:
St. Louis Sports Online
Reluctance & Mystery,
Talent & Expectations:
A Conversation with Rick Ankiel
originally posted June 28, 1999
Rick Ankiel is the brightest lefthanded pitching prospect in all of baseball…and at 19 years of age, is gaining maturity on and off the field…
Earlier this month, Thomas Harding, the Memphis Redbirds’ beat writer for the Memphis Commercial-Appeal, asked yours truly a simple question.
It was a question I’ve heard before.
But admittedly, the sports context of his question...was new.
Certainly, though, Harding’s query brought a smile to my face.
His question was this: “How was it for you?”
Harding, a friendly bloke, wanted to hear about the Rick Ankiel interview I had conducted earlier that evening in the Redbirds’ dugout.
My answer was polite.
“Good answer!” said the beat writer, making like game-show host Richard Dawson.
Generally speaking, if you want to know something about a professional baseball player, talk to his beat writer.
Evidently, my description of Ankiel squared with Harding’s view of the youngster: reluctant.
MysteryBut the reluctance that Rick Ankiel displays, in his interviews, only adds to the mystery that surrounds him
Here’s an analogy.
Think back to when you were fifteen or sixteen...a freshman in high school.
Wasn’t there a pretty girl, a graduating senior girl, that you found mysterious?
Wasn’t she difficult to approach?
And wasn’t she hard to talk to?
But from a distance...wasn’t she fun to watch?
That’s one way to view the mysterious side of Rick Ankiel.
The first thing you notice about Ankiel, up close, is his demeanor.
No, that’s not exactly right.
It’s the combination of his demeanor and his appearance that is so striking.
It’s like one of those “What’s wrong with this picture?” features, where one thing is out of place in a photograph.
That’s because, while Ankiel is only 19, and his face and body have the unfinished look of a 19 year old, his outward disposition appears to be that of a veteran (or maybe a teenager trying to act like a veteran).
In this reporter’s opinion, an opinion based on a limited set of observations, Ankiel’s disposition displays equal parts detached arrogance and active intimidation.
And as the recent pre-game beaning in a collegiate baseball game evidenced, there is a substantial intimidation component to pitching
(Don’t believe that? Step into a batting cage and dial it up to 80 MPH. You’ll get the picture...and don’t forget your helmet.)
So, for what it’s worth, Rick Ankiel appears intimidating...and mysterious.
TalentFrom a distance, though, Rick Ankiel’s pitching talent is obvious to anyone with even a modest knowledge of baseball.
For starters, Ankiel’s delivery has a bit of (ex-Met lefty) Sid Fernandez flavor to it.
You remember El Sid--he hid the ball behind his front hip and leg for what seemed like an eternity, before projecting an above-average fastball toward the batter.
Ankiel’s trickery isn’t as pronounced, but it’s there, and he uses it to his advantage. As a result, Ankiel’s fastball seems to handcuff hitters in a way that adds a few MPH to its 91-92 MPH velocity.
Ankiel’s breaking pitch looks more like a curve ball than a slider. Its effects are best observed by observing the helpless, weak-kneed batter, who often looks like a Little Leaguer watching his first roundhouse.
That’s because Ankiel can throw his sharp-breaking curve for strikes...which, when combined with his heavy fastball, leads to stupendous strikeout totals.
But that’s not all. Ankiel’s change-up, though harder to spot from the stands, is apparently well developed, too.
So where do those strikeouts come from?
In the words of Cardinals minor league pitching coordinator Mark Riggins: “He has a very deceptive fastball...the ball jumps...it explodes at the plate.
“He can pitch up in the zone...and the ball just jumps by the hitters’ bat. He can use his change-up to strike guys out...he can use his curve-ball to strike guys out...he has weapons that produce strikeouts. He’s a gamer. He’s an intense guy. When he has two strikes on a guy he tries to strike him out and he has the weapons to do that.”
Riggins continues: “It’s amazing that [Ankiel] has the breaking ball and the change-up at 19 years of age.
“We have guys in our system at the AAA level that we’re still trying to teach the change-up to. Rick has all of those pitches already. It’s just a matter of consistency and getting those pitches in the locations he needs to...all the time.”
Which leads to...
ExpectationsAnkiel is 19 years old. The last 19 year old pitcher to make a big splash in the big leagues was Dwight Gooden.
Is it unreasonable to compare Ankiel, the summer 1999 Ankiel, with Gooden?
“I think so,” said Riggins. “You don’t want to put that much of a burden on him. We as pitching coaches treat every kid the same...whether he was a number one [pick] or a free agent...whether he is 8-and-1 or 1-and-8...
“We treat all these guys the same...and try not to put the pressure on him...that’s created more by the media..
“The expectations are also created by the fans,” continued Riggins. “That’s great...I love that stuff. But we shouldn’t put that much of a burden on Rick right now. He’s still a young kid trying to develop his stuff.”
And a young kid that, at 6-1 and 190 lbs, still sometimes looks like the teen-ager that he is.
Yet one final word from the Cardinals minor league pitching coordinator, Mark Riggins.
“His body is still growing. Usually at 21 or 22 years old...they fully develop. He’s got a couple more years...and may grow an inch or two…and his body will harden up,” Riggins said.
“When we signed him he was just a soft kid...a little overweight for his age...
“Last year in Peoria...Rick was very low on a test administered by our minor league strength coordinator.
“Rick, he was very low in the group of pitchers. That really stuck in his mind...but the very next day he was out early, running...
“By the end of the year, last year, he had grown into a man and he’s still growing.”
The Last WordsAnd how might Rick Ankiel finalize his development?
Recently, it was suggested to Cardinals pitching coach Dave Duncan that a pitcher combining the veteran moxie of Kent Bottenfield with the talent and tools of a Rick Ankiel would be a superstar pitcher.
“That would be a nice combination,” Duncan replied. “Hopefully that’s what Rick Ankiel will be when he gets to the big leagues. He’ll have his physical skills so that he can execute and the only thing that will be missing is what you gain with experience at this level.
“And that’s knowing the opposition and knowing what you have to do to be a successful major league pitcher. He is 19 years old. There’s no getting around that,” Duncan said.
“I think he’s a mature 19 when it comes to baseball...he has a very good idea what he’s doing. He pays attention...he’s been a very coachable athlete and he’s learned a lot in the short time he’s been playing professional baseball.”
And Cardinals GM Walt Jocketty‘s view on Ankiel?
“Rick Ankiel is a young man who just needs a little more seasoning. He’s going to get better with experience. He’s got great ability and great pitches...he has to learn how to get hitters out at the higher levels...how to set up guys....everything comes easy for him right now but it’s going to get tougher as he moves up. But I think he’s very capable of making the adjustments.”
Jocketty’s parting shot, issued in March of 1999?
Not a promise or a commitment; just a declarative sentence.
“I don’t think it will be very long before he gets to St. Louis.”
[recorded June 12, 1999]
StLSO: We’re here in Nashville, Tennessee, visiting with Memphis Redbirds lefthander Rick Ankiel. Good afternoon, Rick.
Ankiel: Hi…how you doin’?
StLSO: We’re doing all right. Rick Ankiel…you’re 19 years old…you finished high school…two years ago?
Ankiel: Yeah, I believe so.
StLSO: That’s not too long ago. Fans are interested in your pitching ability and they are interested in some other things about you. Your pitching ability has brought you along way…do your high school days seem like a long time ago…or just yesterday?
Ankiel: It seems like a long time ago…to be honest. Last year was a long year, this year has gone well and has been flying by and I hope it will continue to be the same.
StLSO: What kinds of experiences from your high school days directly apply to what it is you’re doing now?
Ankiel: What do you mean?
StLSO: What I mean is…did you feel like your pitching skills were pretty well formed as a senior in high school…or not?
Ankiel: I don’t think so. [In high school] I just went out there and threw. I’ve started to learn a lot about pitching rather than just throwing the ball by people. I’m learning a lot and it’s a lot of fun right now and it couldn’t be better.
StLSO: It couldn’t be better…I guess you had a satisfactory for yourself last night…you feel pretty good about your performance yesterday?
Ankiel: I think last night was probably my worst performance of the year.
StLSO: In what way was it not as good as you would like?
Ankiel: In every way…in five innings I threw 92 pitches. As a starter, you’re not going to be able to stay in the game and help your team. As a starter, you just can’t pitch like that.
StLSO: We cover 40 or 50 games with the Cardinals every year…and you can hardly do a post-game interview with Tony La Russa and Dave Duncan without either of them using words like ‘adversity’ and people being able to come back from adversity…was yesterday as adverse a set of conditions that you’ve faced as a minor leaguer?
Ankiel: I don’t know as a minor leaguer…but definitely this year. It just wasn’t a good outing…I couldn’t really find a zone and things just didn’t really go too well.
StLSO: Rick, what is it that you like best about minor league baseball at this point…your teammates, the traveling…or not?
Ankiel: Everything…I mean…you’re playing something that you love to do and you’re playing in a dream when you’re doing things like that.
StLSO: So things are in a real positive sense for you…you’re happy where you’re at, biding your time, and looking to make good pitches…
Ankiel: I guess so.
StLSO: I’m wondering if there’s something I can ask you outside of baseball…that you’d be interested in talking about…high school…favorite classes…something you were interested in or not?
Ankiel: No man…baseball…that’s it.
StLSO: When you were eight, when you were ten, when you were twelve…you wrote on a paper somewhere that you wanted to be a baseball player…how long has this been a dream of yours?
Ankiel: I think, like, most kids in America, just growing up…it’s always a dream…for me, I don’t know. I guess ever since I’ve been little…right now, I’m trying to fulfill that and just keep focused on baseball.
StLSO: Do you have any sense of the anticipation that the folks in the city by the Arch, St. Louis, have for you?
Ankiel: I don’t pay attention to that…I leave that up to you guys…I just try to stay focused on pitching…and not worry about media…and other outside influences.
StLSO: Frankly, we’re interested, in the media, as well as the fans, in seeing that, that can happen for you, Rick Ankiel…good luck the rest of the year.
Ankiel: Thank you.
Out on a Limb?
posted August 27. 1998A look at the way the St. Louis media handled the publicity surrounding Mark McGwire’s use of androstenedione
DATE: August 27, 1998
....on KMOX radio, Hall-of-Fame sportscaster Jack Buck said it was a “non-story”, and pledged not to talk about the Mark McGwire androstenedione controversy.
Ex-St. Louis Sports Online contributor Randy Karraker, ably working the KMOX mike alongside Buck, agreed.
KTRS’ Kevin Slaten pitched in with his own bombastic opinion, saying that the original AP account of the story, and the front page androstenedione follow-up by the Post-Dispatch, only confirmed his own view that print journalists, and sportswriters in particular, are the lowest form of life on this planet.
In essence, Slaten completely agreed with the stated Buck-Karraker on-air opinion, saying that the whole Mac-andro affair was a “non-story”.
On KFNS AM-590, host Frank Cusumano expressed his view that “it’s legal, and therefore I don’t have a problem with it”.
St. Louis media veteran Scott Simon, another former St. Louis Sports Online contributor who now plies his trade at Kansas City’s CBS AM outlet, KMBZ, informed yours truly that the story was overblown...that he himself suffers from asthma, and the medication that he takes to control his condition renders him ineligible for the Olympics.
(EDITOR’S NOTE: I’m thinking of the Jamaican bobsled team...Mr. Simon.)
Post-Dispatch columnist Bernie Miklasz, a recent guest of the Saturday Sports Review, chimed in with a rather balanced view of the McGwire andro connection, noting that (1) the Olympic ban of andro can’t be taken too seriously in light of the IOC’s banning of various over-the-counter medications (such as Sudafed); and (2) the NBA ban of andro is ridiculous, too, since pot is not on the league’s list of banned substances.
But Miklasz covered all bases by espousing the view that androstenedione is legal, considered to be a nutritional supplement, and not banned by baseball’s establishment.
In other words, it’s OK to take andro because it’s not against the rules to do so.
KFNS’ Brian Stull, yet another former St. Louis Sports Online contributor, noted that the current media attention to Mac’s andro usage is, in his view, overblown, since Stull claims that McGwire openly discussed his use of supplements on at least two occasions in the weeks prior to the AP “scoop”.
And in their initial comments on the McGwire story, which were apparently based on early media accounts of the controversy, St. Louis Sports Online columnist (and WGNU sportscaster) Mike Huss, and St. Louis Sports Online photographer Eric Niederhoffer both leaned toward the view that the story was overblown...and that a possible driving force for the story was the media’s incessant desire to tear down the heroes that they themselves elevate.
So, despite all those opinions, all which sound logical in one way or another...
…why does McGwire’s use of andro leave a funny feeling in the pit of the stomach of this observer?
I don’t know.
Well, maybe I do.
Maybe it’s because all of Mac’s defenders sound, to my ears, a lot like President Clinton’s defenders.
Literally straining to defend their man.
Parsing their words.
And sounding like lawyers.
The Clinton defenders...and the McGwire defenders...their statements sound OK...they just don’t sound right.
Complicating issues include the fact that yours truly voted for Clinton.
And McGwire’s mammoth home runs have lit up summer for this particular sports consumer like no other recent time in sports.
But one thing seems certain.
In the 1998 baseball season, there is almost nothing connected with Mark McGwire that can be referred to as a non-story.
And the McGwire-androstenedione connection is, in fact, a huge story.
And, to this observer, it seems wrong to blame the media for publishing a story that, in more than one aspect, defines sports in the ‘90s.
We haven’t heard the last of Big Mac and androstenedione.
It does seem unfortunate, though, that in this one-in-a-lifetime baseball season, that Mark McGwire’s historic chase has been tarnished.
One more thing, though.
Recall that longtime St. Louis baseball observers--guys like Bob Broeg, Red Schoendienst, George Kissell, and the aforementioned Buck (that’s about two centuries worth of baseball there, folks)--all grin and utter more or less the same line, when asked about McGwire.
“I’ve never seen anything like him.”